

Seems that by changing from 50 to 512, the RAM reduced too much and as soon as it went > 50-80%, even though no compiler issues, I started to get random ‘errors’ It's probably just more slow EEPROM turnaround time.įixed the issue, by changing to Mega from Leonardo

What do you mean by 41 instead of 6? Tests? If so can you list which ones, ideally with debug output. The string should always be truncated by RDM at 32 bytes the other test checks for different responses when nacking a message that's too long but fits in the buffer from one that doesn't.īUT, not that the buffer is it fails 41 instead of 6 !!! any ideas ? I noticed this as the OLA rdm-tests fail several tests, like E120_DEVICE_LABEL, > 32char when set to 60, it truncates the RDM message at exactly 32char (I don't know why a buffer of 60 truncates the RDM Data at 32bytes)? when i increase the buffer to - we now capture the NACK for > 32 char test You'll need to either use Git or ask nicely to release a new version. byte buffer RDM allows 231 Bytes, so why set at 60 ? The next major release of R) is available in the r-devel snapshot build.I notice that the receive buffer is 60 BYTES ? // the byte array used while receiving and sending.

General information about R and the R WindowsįAQ for Windows-specific information.
